How to get fastest instruction speed on STR9

[ebrombaugh]

Posted on July 23, 2007 at 22:49

How to get fastest instruction speed on STR9

[ebrombaugh]

Posted on May 17, 2011 at 09:45

Hi,

I'm just getting started with STR9 programming and I've got a very fundamental question: Roughly how many instructions/second can the ARM966E in the STR9 run. Assuming the following conditions:

* Max clock rate (96MHz)

* Program resides in Flash with proper wait states

* Data in SRAM

* No I/O, flash data or peripheral access

What settings would I have to use to achieve this?

The reason I ask is that I've got an STR912FW44 here, and when I set it up in a short loop to toggle a GPIO bit (3 instruction loop in Flash), the instruction rate comes out to ~25MHz. I'm running from the PLL set to 96 MHz. Seems to be kind of slow.

Any suggestions appreciated!

Eric

[ebrombaugh]

Posted on May 17, 2011 at 09:45

(replying to self)

An earlier msg from mirou pointed out AN2551 which goes into a lot of detail about optimizing:

http://www.st.com/stonline/products/literature/an/13563.pdf

This suggests it should be possible to approach 96MIPS with careful setup and coding. I'll look into what's going on with my system - maybe I overlooked something.

Eric

[m_j_butcher]

Posted on May 17, 2011 at 09:45

Hi

Using the application note and buffered I/O I have been able to achieve 6MHz port toggling (this corresponds to the value - 12MHz edges - advertised by ST when running at 96MHz).

At a recent ARM seminar the tutor said that the average instruction rate is typically 1.9 clocks per instruction. This would typically give about 50MIPs at 96MHz clock.

Recently I had to add a short delay loop to correct a hardware issue and I used the calculation based on looking at the assembler instructions generated, the 96MHz clock rate and the 1.9 conversion factor and the loop count that I set did indeed generate the delay that I wanted (and calculated).

I am not absolutely sure myself because I was originally expecting 96MIPs (1 clock for 1 instruction) but 50MIPs does seem more like the practical result.

Final point. I have a benchmark which was running on a Rev. D chip. The same benchmark running on a Rev.G (with imporved pipeline) was 13% faster. ST expects up to 30% speed improvement between these Revs. (which may be true but probably somewhat code dependent).

Regards

Mark

http://www.uTasker.com

[mark9]

Posted on May 17, 2011 at 09:45

My experience with the GPIO hardware is that two writes to the GPIO hardware are not pipelineable. I'm pretty sure this is a limitation of the GPIO hardware (ST micro) and not the CPU (ARM). You can check this by adding NOPs to your toggling loop. It should *not* slow down the output. In otherwords, the GPIO hardware is interlocking the processor if you write too quickly to it, but you are free to do non-GPIO tasks while the GPIO hardware pipeline gets flushed.

The bottom line is that you should not use the STR91x to do bit banging.

[ebrombaugh]

Posted on May 17, 2011 at 09:45

@Mark: Thanks for the info on cycles/instruction. Disappointing, but not surprising. I was under the impression that most ARM instructions were single cycle, except for branches etc. It's worth noting though that my copy of the ARM architecture ref. manua

[ebrombaugh]

Posted on May 17, 2011 at 09:45

OK,

Here's the ARM document with instruction timing for the 966E:

http://www.arm.com/pdfs/DDI0240A_9ES_R2.pdf

Look in section 7 for details. Interesting thing I came across in searching was a statement that with all the pipelines etc there's no guarantee that a NOP takes any time at all!

Eric