Skip to main content
Visitor II
June 15, 2018
Question

Marking problems of EPCS4SI8N after De-capsulation

  • June 15, 2018
  • 1 reply
  • 1299 views
Posted on June 15, 2018 at 04:56

Recently we get a series of EPCS4SI8N parts which are in flash memory type. After comparing with golden samples provides by our customer, we found several key differences in its die structure and surface marking pattern. We also find ST logo in golden sample's die marking surprisingly, although it is manufactured by Altera. Can any technical staff from ST explain these marking problems? Thank you! The following are the key differences of our products from golden samples:

0690X00000604YdQAI.jpg0690X00000604h3QAA.jpg0690X00000604bfQAA.jpg0690X00000604h8QAA.jpg

Surface markings show big differences include that on Top and bottom patterns.  

Our samples show no MFG logo but ''MIAMI4M'' and ''2013-0329'' die markings on die surface. Golden samples show ST's logo, copy right 2008 and ''52JB 4'' die markings on die surface. 

All our samples don't match with golden samples both on surface and die markings. We hesitate that we buy fake parts. Please help to explain whether the markings can verify if these samples are good or fake. Thank you! 

#epcs4si8n #diemarking #marking-brand #wrong-device-marking #package-marking #device-marking
    This topic has been closed for replies.

    1 reply

    Graduate II
    August 10, 2018

    Interesting, but something probably you want to discuss with local sales office.