Posted on November 17, 2015 at 14:16Hello,
do you check forst the communication with ST95HF
What is the sent command ?
have look below to the flow of a correct Tag calibration seqence
11-17-2015 14:13:49 >>> CR95HFDLL_ECHO
<<< 5500
11-17-2015 14:13:49 >>> -> 1st step : VERIFY detection with DacDataH=0x00 (min value)
11-17-2015 14:13:49 >>> CR95HFDll_STCmd, 01 070E03A100F801180020606000003F01
<<< 000102
11-17-2015 14:13:49 >>> -> 2nd step : VERIFY no detection with DacDataH=0xFC (max value)
11-17-2015 14:13:50 >>> CR95HFDll_STCmd, 01 070E03A100F801180020606000FC3F01
<<< 000101
11-17-2015 14:13:50 >>> -> 3rd step : Calibration with DacDataH=0x7C
11-17-2015 14:13:50 >>> CR95HFDll_STCmd, 01 070E03A100F8011800206060007C3F01
<<< 000101
11-17-2015 14:13:50 >>> -> 4th step : Calibration with DacDataH=0x3C
11-17-2015 14:13:51 >>> CR95HFDll_STCmd, 01 070E03A100F8011800206060003C3F01
<<< 000102
11-17-2015 14:13:51 >>> -> 5th step : Calibration with DacDataH=0x5C
11-17-2015 14:13:52 >>> CR95HFDll_STCmd, 01 070E03A100F8011800206060005C3F01
<<< 000102
11-17-2015 14:13:52 >>> -> 6th step : Calibration with DacDataH=0x6C
11-17-2015 14:13:52 >>> CR95HFDll_STCmd, 01 070E03A100F8011800206060006C3F01
<<< 000101
11-17-2015 14:13:52 >>> -> 7th step : Calibration with DacDataH=0x64
11-17-2015 14:13:53 >>> CR95HFDll_STCmd, 01 070E03A100F801180020606000643F01
<<< 000102
11-17-2015 14:13:53 >>> -> 8th step : Calibration with DacDataH=0x68
11-17-2015 14:13:53 >>> CR95HFDll_STCmd, 01 070E03A100F801180020606000683F01
<<< 000102
11-17-2015 14:13:53 >>> ---> Calibration result : DacDataL = 0x60 / DacDataH = 0x70