Skip to main content
Visitor II
August 4, 2022
Solved

Using VPS_TX=5V on ST25R95

  • August 4, 2022
  • 1 reply
  • 605 views

I had powered VPS_TX of ST25R95 on 5V. So, ideally there should be improvement on the magnetic field as per the calculated data using that calculation tool. But I got adverse effect of it. It can't detect the tag, which works fine on 3.3V VPS_TX supply.

    This topic has been closed for replies.
    Best answer by Brian TIDAL

    Hi Sunil,

    See https://community.st.com/s/question/0D53W00000HLDkKSAX/improve-rf-field-st25r95 for similar question.

    Basically, Increasing power by putting 5V has benefit in the transmit path but have also impact on receive path because their is no modification on chip sensitivity and thus Tag answer may be not seen correctly.

    Therefore, ST recommends to use 3.3V configuration with ST25R95.

    If it is needed to increase the reading distance for your application, I would recommend to use either the ST25R3911B or the ST25R3916B reader device.

    Rgds

    BT

    1 reply

    Technical Moderator
    August 4, 2022

    Hi Sunil,

    See https://community.st.com/s/question/0D53W00000HLDkKSAX/improve-rf-field-st25r95 for similar question.

    Basically, Increasing power by putting 5V has benefit in the transmit path but have also impact on receive path because their is no modification on chip sensitivity and thus Tag answer may be not seen correctly.

    Therefore, ST recommends to use 3.3V configuration with ST25R95.

    If it is needed to increase the reading distance for your application, I would recommend to use either the ST25R3911B or the ST25R3916B reader device.

    Rgds

    BT