Cannot get can0 interface to appear on STM32MP157f-dk2

[IanY]

Hello,

I am trying to setup CANbus on the STM32MP157f-dk2 board, but I am unable to get any CAN interface to appear. I have installed the STM32MP1 OpenSTLinux Developer-Package onto the board, and I am using an SN65HVD230 transceiver.

First I tried enabling pins PB12 and PB13 for FDCAN2, and connecting the transceiver to GPIO pins 10 and 36 on the board.

For device tree configuration, I generated a device tree source file with STM32CubeMX and copied the pinctrl and m_can2 bindings from the generated file into "stm32mp157f-dk2.dts" located in the kernel sources. I then compiled the device tree using "make ARCH=arm dtbs". I then copy stm32mp157f-dk2.dtb to the board.

I attached the exact dts file I am using.

For driver configuration, I believe the BOSCH M_CAN driver is enabled by default, so I did not change anything in Menuconfig. Although I doubled checked that the selections were correct.

 

 

The can0 interface does not appear as an available network interface:

root@stm32mp1:~# ls /sys/class/net
end0  lo  usb0 wlan0


I also checked the log messages to see if the driver was properly set up:

root@stm32mp1:~# dmesg | grep CAN
[    0.310964] CAN device driver interface
[    0.361318] NET: Registered PF_CAN protocol family


Then I checked the device-tree on the board and it seems the device is enabled:

root@stm32mp1:/proc/device-tree/soc/etzpc@5c007000# cat can@4400f000/status
okay


Another thing I have tried is setting up FDCAN1 by adding the m_can1 binding to the end of "stm32mp157f-dk2.dts".

&m_can1 {
pinctrl-names = "default", "sleep";
pinctrl-0 = <&m_can1_pins_b>;
pinctrl-1 = <&m_can1_sleep_pins_b>;
status = "okay";
};

This binding will set the pinctrl to pins PA11 and PA12, which connect to pins 5 and 3 of CN2 on the board. However, I am experiencing the exact same issue in this scenario. I see the same log messages as above, and confirmed that the can@4400e000 status is okay.


I started to wonder if maybe the interface will not be available if there is no transceiver connected? I have tried connecting my SN65HVD230 transceiver, but this does not seem to make any difference.

I am also wondering if there is a problem with how I am modifying the device tree sources? Or perhaps there are issues if some other devices are also using the same pins?

I noticed in the post https://community.st.com/t5/stm32-mpus-products/how-to-setup-fdcan-on-stm32mp157f-dk2/td-p/66594 the op said they removed the i2c pullup resistors connected to pins PA11 and PA12. I am assuming they mean they desoldered those resistors from the board? Is that really necessary?

Any help would be greatly appreciated!

[IanY]

Taking a closer look at this post https://community.st.com/t5/stm32-mpus-products/how-to-setup-fdcan-on-stm32mp157f-dk2/td-p/66594, it appears the op actually put the resisters back on the board, and another user also had success while leaving the resistors in place. So that answers one of my questions.


I built the kernel according to the instructions on this page: https://wiki.st.com/stm32mpu/wiki/Getting_started/STM32MP1_boards/STM32MP157x-DK2/Develop_on_Arm%C2%AE_Cortex%C2%AE-A7/Modify,_rebuild_and_reload_the_Linux%C2%AE_kernel

These instructions make no mention of building U-boot, OP-TEE, or T-FA. I have not even extracted the archives for these components, because I am not modifying them.

I am focusing now on enabling m_can1 as per the example on https://wiki.st.com/stm32mpu/wiki/FDCAN_device_tree_configuration

by appending these lines to the existing "stm32mp157f-dk2.dts" file in the kernel sources.

&m_can1 {
pinctrl-names = "default", "sleep";
pinctrl-0 = <&m_can1_pins_b>;
pinctrl-1 = <&m_can1_sleep_pins_b>;
status = "okay";
};

After compiling the dtb and copying it to the board, I checked the kernel logs again with dmesg. This time I searched for "can" in lower case.

root@stm32mp1:~# dmesg | grep can
[ 0.372228] can: controller area network core
[ 0.372360] can: raw protocol
[ 0.372374] can: broadcast manager protocol
[ 0.372390] can: netlink gateway - max_hops=1
[ 2.101847] m_can_platform 4400e000.can: no clock found

The m_can1 binding defined in "stm32mp153.dtsi" contains this property.
clocks = <&rcc CK_HSE>, <&rcc FDCAN_K>;

But when I grep for "rcc CK_HSE" and "rcc FDCAN_K" in the kernel device tree sources, I don't get any results.

Where is the rcc binding defined? Do I need to modify the device tree sources for U-boot, OP-TEE, or T-FA to configure the RCC?

[IanY]

In "stm32mp157c0dk2-scmi.dtsi" which was included from "stm32mp157f-dk2.dts", I found this binding:
&rcc {
compatible = "st,stm32mp1-rcc-secure", "syscon";
clock-names = "hse", "hsi", "csi", "lse", "lsi";
clocks = <&scmi_clk CK_SCMI_HSE>,
<&scmi_clk CK_SCMI_HSI>,
<&scmi_clk CK_SCMI_CSI>,
<&scmi_clk CK_SCMI_LSE>,
<&scmi_clk CK_SCMI_LSI>;
};


I then modified the m_can1 binding in "stm32mp157f-dk2.dts" so that the line:
"clocks = <&rcc CK_HSE>, <&rcc FDCAN_K>;"
would be replaced with
"clocks = <&scmi_clk CK_SCMI_HSE>, <&rcc FDCAN_K>;"

I attached my complete stm32mp157f-dk2.dts file.

This is the same solution as for this post:
https://community.st.com/t5/stm32-mpus-products/fdcan-can-not-start-no-clock-found/m-p/613570

After compiling with this change, the no clock found error went away and the can0 interface became available.

I still have no idea how the FDCAN_K property is used, or where it is defined.

[xchen]

Hi,

I had the same problem enabling the m_can1. 

I use the solution that modify the clock, the m_can1 bus is working, howerver, the DSI display is going wrong. 

I think it might be that the dsi and can share the same clock source.

Do you have the same problem or have any idea to fix this?

 

[IanY]

I had actually removed the display for this project.

Perhaps if you check the discovery kit user manual UM2534 and the alternate function table in the STM32MP157f datasheet, you could find a different pair of CAN pins exposed on the development board. You could also try enabling m_can2 instead of m_can1.

Note the m_can1_pins_b property is defined in one of the pin control DTI files included from stm32mp157f-dk2.dts. So if you look in that DTI file you can find other pin combinations for m_can1 and m_can2.

[ienecode]

---

@IanY wrote:

I started to wonder if maybe the interface will not be available if there is no transceiver connected?

---

So, Is it necessary to connect the transceiver?

[ienecode]

@IanY @xchen  I am trying run CAN. But I have weird problem, which one described below:

can-communication-on-stm32mp157f-dk2 

Do you have any idea what can be wrong ?

[xchen]

Use m_can2 instead of m_can1.

[ienecode]

@xchento use m_can2, I should change pins to m_can2_pins_a ?

m_can2_pins_a included PB13 i PB5 pins. PB13 i on CN2 connector , but PB5, according with documentation:

PB5 is used as ETH_CLK not the default configuration.

How did you deal with it ? Where the PB5 is located on board  ?

Are you used  below marked place to connect transceiver (PB5 - RX ) ?

 

[xchen]

PB13 and PB12

[ienecode]

@xchen

Thank you !

m_can1 and m_can2  works perfectly with DSI display.

The problem with my display was generated by my wrong written application - I had reciving frames based on while loop which on bloking my program.