Missing global variables which are not arrays when loading axf file.

[VOlet.1]

I am using keil compiler and loading the .axf file.

Other than global variable which are arrays no other global variables are visible in the variable list for selection.

What i am missing here?

[stephane.legargeant]

Hello VOlet.1 Do you mean that you don't have any variable listed when you load the file. Or do you have some variables, but others are missing ?

[VOlet.1]

Hi,

Only few variables are displayed (Most variables are missing).

Interestingly, I see only arrays in the list.

No other variables (apart from arrays) are listed in the window.

[Thierry]

Dear VOlet.1,

Could you share your axf file such as we can look at what is going wrong ?

Thanks

[VOlet.1]

Hi,

Is it possible that i email/send file directly without posting publicly?

[Thierry]

Dear VOlet.1,

Thanks for having shared the axf file by private message.

From what I saw in your axf file, all the non decoded variables are coming from classes in .cpp files.

Unfortunately, and as mentioned in this thread , the C++ is currently not supported (or very partially like for arrays in your case) by STM32CubeMonitor parser.

[VOlet.1]

Hi Thierry,

Thanks for checking on this and duly noted.

I hope this is addressed in upcoming releases.

Speaking of version numbers i couldn't find any option through which i could check which version of cube monitor i am running.

Any way of finding this out from GUI?

[Thierry]

Dear VOlet.1,

For version numbers, you should be able to check it by opening "About STM32CubeMonitor" popup window from hamburger menu.

[VOlet.1]

Sorry i missed that, thanks.

But do note that the version numbers listed on the site doesn't match with the number on the app.

And thank you for the quick and helpful replies!

[Thierry]

You are welcome. Thanks for highlighting the version mismatch, the one from about window is the correct one :)

[Thierry]

@VOlet.1​  Please be informed that the version numbers are now aligned between ST site and "about" window from the tool itself.

Thanks again for having raised the mismatch.