New STM32F4xx Reference Manual RM0090

[waclawek.jan]

Posted on November 05, 2012 at 11:28

Revision 2 of RM0090 is available.

http://www.st.com/internet/com/TECHNICAL_RESOURCES/TECHNICAL_LITERATURE/REFERENCE_MANUAL/DM00031020.pdf

JW

[Tesla DeLorean]

Posted on November 09, 2015 at 13:19

That didn't translate too well. So did you change the silicon design or process to effect this improvement? Or did you re-characterize the current silicon over a broader range and are now willing to guarantee existing parts will operate at these speeds over temperature?

[waclawek.jan]

Posted on June 06, 2016 at 19:00

RM0090 rev.12 is out.

(The STM32F405/407 Errata on the webpage is said to be version 7, but version 6 downloads - is that an overlook?)

JW

[Amel NASRI]

Posted on July 14, 2016 at 16:43

Hi Jan,

Please note that the issue related to the errata sheet version is fixed. Now you have the

http://www.st.com/content/ccc/resource/technical/document/errata_sheet/0a/98/58/84/86/b6/47/a2/DM00037591.pdf/files/DM00037591.pdf/jcr:content/translations/en.DM00037591.pdf

available on the web.

-Mayla-

[waclawek.jan]

Posted on July 15, 2016 at 12:48

Thanks, Mayla.

Jan

[waclawek.jan]

Posted on October 04, 2016 at 11:14

RM0090 rev.13 is out.

One of the changes is an updated explanation for BUSTURN in FMC_BTR/_BWTR. However, the respective text for BUSTURN in FSMC_BTR/_BWTR did not change.

Seriously?

JW

[waclawek.jan]

Posted on May 04, 2017 at 22:08

RM0090 rev.14 is out.

[waclawek.jan]

Posted on July 25, 2017 at 11:45

RM0090 rev.15 is out.

Also the STM32F405/407xx and STM32F415/417xx errata is in a new rev.9.

JW

[waclawek.jan]

Posted on June 15, 2018 at 15:46

Shortly after rev.16 (Apr.2018) rev.17 (June 2018) is out.

I can't find relevant differences between rev.16 and rev.17 based on the changelog, except for one letter in SAI register description, and adding a new die revision to the list of IDCODEs (my guess is that this relates to the ongoing transfer of all 90nm products from France to TSMC).

Does anybody see any of the advertised differences in the RCC clock trees or the interrupt vector tables?

Thanks,

JW

PS: Spotted this while staring at the vector tables:

[waclawek.jan]

... and this is still there in Rev.20:

JW

[KDJEM.1]

Hello @waclawek.jan ;

 

This issue is fixed in RM0090 Rev 21.

 

Thank you.

Kaouthar