Skip to main content
Explorer II
July 25, 2025
Solved

Unsolicited interrupts when temperature rises around 60°C

  • July 25, 2025
  • 3 replies
  • 405 views

Hello,

I am using a STM32L476RCT which should work up to 85°C.

I am receiving unsolicited interrupts when I put my board in an environment at 60°C.

I only use usart1 and a few GPIO interrupts, which are working fine. But when the temperature rises, the system gets stuck.
Using the debugger, I was able to see that interrupts are occurring and sending the system to default handler. Those interrupts are WWDG_IRQHandler, and UART/USARTX_IRQHandler. Looking at the registers, those interrupts should be disabled. We do not use WWDG.
A quick fix is to define a custom handler for the interruptions that I don't want, but it does not explain why those interruptions are occurring.

Does anyone has any idea what could go wrong ?

Thanks

 

 

    This topic has been closed for replies.
    Best answer by TDK

    Look at the VECTACTIVE bits in the SCB register to see which interrupt actually got triggered and go from there.

    3 replies

    Graduate
    July 25, 2025

    If WWDG interrupt is not configured, then all unused/non-handled exceptions will land in the default handler; the debugger shows its name as WWDG_IrqHandler.

    Looks like there is some exception triggered - you may use the debugger to check the interrupt identifier while stuck in the default handler.

    USART interrupt is a different story - check your code for this interrupt enable & configuration.

    TDKAnswer
    Super User
    July 25, 2025

    Look at the VECTACTIVE bits in the SCB register to see which interrupt actually got triggered and go from there.

    gmaengAuthor
    Explorer II
    July 25, 2025

    I will try that and see if something comes up, thank you.

    Just to clarify : WWDG_IRQ happens when my firmware is unchanged. If I define WWDG_IRQ (with just a return), then I get UART5_IRQ. When I disable it, I get USART2 and so on. Does the debugger shows this because it is the first undefined handler it finds after the exception ?

    Super User
    July 25, 2025

    Yes, it's in the default handler as explained by @gbm .

    ST Employee
    July 28, 2025

    Hi @gmaeng 

     

    This post has been escalated to the ST Online Support Team for additional assistance.  We'll contact you directly.

     

    Regards,

    Billy