Skip to main content
Best answer by FBL

Hi @Brenden_PLUS 

Differences mainly lie in number of peripheral instances and clock/reset bus architecture, not in core functionality. Also, note that, minor silicon revisions and optimizations may exist between these 2 families.

1 reply

FBLBest answer
Technical Moderator
December 24, 2025

Hi @Brenden_PLUS 

Differences mainly lie in number of peripheral instances and clock/reset bus architecture, not in core functionality. Also, note that, minor silicon revisions and optimizations may exist between these 2 families.

To give better visibility on the answered topics, please click on Accept as Solution on the reply which solved your issue or answered your question.Best regards,FBL
Senior
December 26, 2025

Thanks for the info

 

I decided not to go down the road of linking the address to the device tree to try it.  

 

Currently Zephyr and USB c is kind of the bare minimum.  You can see the github issue list here.

https://github.com/zephyrproject-rtos/zephyr/issues/38371

 

But it's mostly the bare minimum.  To minimum for my needs.